Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Pieta the other ones are my favorite Art

The famous later Pieta aka The Deposition (also called the Florentine Pietà or The Lamentation over the Dead Christ) in the Vatican is marble poetry as well.  It is more realistic than the Neoclassical first one and gives an impression of stillness. I like this one better, with its dynamic and sinuous composition, and its Immense DRAMA....
 
 
 
 
The figure of Mary on the right is incomplete. Why didn't a he finish her and make her so beautiful like he did in the first Pieta? It was propbaly deliberately unfinished because Mary was so conflicted and wounded but so faithful and trusting. Many say it was a deliberate aesthetic choice but I think it was a Theological Choice....Consider the uncfinished work of Christ...his Mystical Body...as St. Paul says I make up what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ.  Mysterious words from St. Paul don't you think?  Perhaps that is where the Roman Catholic tradition to offer up our sufferings up to the Cross of Christ... 
Pieta from the Side
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Also having and almost ineffible quality is the Rondanini Pieta 
 
Rondanini Pietà is a marble sculpture that Michelangelo worked on from the 1550s until the last weeks of his life, in 1564. It is housed in the Castello Sforzesco in Milan. His final sculpture, the Rondanini Pietà revisited the theme of the Virgin Mary mourning over the body of the dead Christ, which he had first explored in his Pietà of 1499. Like his late series of drawings of the Crucifixion and the sculpture of the Deposition of Christ intended for his own tomb, it was produced at a time when Michelangelo's sense of his own mortality (and with it his spirituality) was growing


Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.

Another Muslim attack? Who knows but it sure wasn't a Christian cuz they'd tell us...

Suljeman Talovic, the Utah Killer just happens to be a Muslim from Bosnia. Is this sudden Jihad Syndrome? Who knows the MSM is mum.

Here is another story of an Attack. Just so happens to be this social worker who is another Muslim who was caring for a "Mentally disturbed" person in Berkley when the attack occurred. Was the attacker a Muslim? I do not know but this lady is a Sufi Muslim.



  • A former Alameda County mental-health worker was sentenced today to five years' probation and ordered to perform community service for being an accessory in an attack in which a teenager slashed the throat of a 75-year-old Berkeley woman.
    Hamaseh Kianfar, 32, initially told police that she happened to be driving by the Berkeley Rose Garden on March 16, 2005, and saw the 16-year-old Oakland girl holding a knife and running down the sidewalk toward the victim, Katherine Pope, and her husband, police said.
    But Kianfar, of San Rafael, later acknowledged that at the time of the attack she was with the mentally disturbed teenager she had met at Juvenile Hall and drove her away from the scene in North Berkeley, police said.
    In court today, Deputy District Attorney Connie Campbell excoriated Kianfar, saying she was unremorseful and failed to acknowledge responsibility in the case. The prosecutor denounced as "psychobabble" and "offensive" claims by Kianfar that she was not able "to have boundaries."


  • Kianfar was accompanied today by friends and family members, including her father, Ali Kianfar, the cofounder of the International Association of Sufism. Sufism is a mystical or esoteric form of the Muslim faith that seeks a direct experience of God. Hamaseh Kianfar and her sister, Sahar, translated and compiled a book titled "Sufi Stories." A posting on Amazon.com shortly after her arrest said Hamaseh Kianfar has a master's degree in psychology. Her mother, Nahid Angha, co-founded the Sufi association.

  • When asked by police to explain her inconsistent statements, Kianfar said she was "confused because the incident was traumatic and her memory was disorganized," police said in a report. "She thought nothing had happened to the couple." But Campbell said today that Kianfar urged the slasher to flee and gave her a ride without notifying police -- and bought her new clothes to help conceal her identity.
    "She has yet to truly take responsibility for what she did," Campbell said. "She paints herself as a kind of hero for calling police. Her story is replete with lies that are completely inconsistent with the facts."
    In June, a juvenile court commissioner ruled that the girl who slashed Pope must undergo treatment at a hospital in Tulare County.


  • Mental health worker accused of aiding teen stabber
    The Associated Press Thursday, May 4 2006 10:15 AM
    Last Updated: Thursday, May 4 2006 10:15 AM
    A former mental health worker was ordered to stand trial on accusations that she helped a girl elude police after stabbing a 75-year-old woman in the neck near the Bereley Rose Garden.
    Hamaseh Kianfar, 31, of San Rafael was ordered Wednesday to return to court May 18 on a charge of being an accessory after the unprovoked assault that seriously injured Katherine Pope as she and her husband walked home from a film class at University of California, Berkeley.
    Kianfar witnessed the attack and then drove the 16-year-old from the scene and bought her new clothes to conceal her identity, prosecutors said. The next day she called police Mental health worker accused of aiding teen stabber
    The Associated Press Thursday, May 4 2006 10:15 AM
    Last Updated: Thursday, May 4 2006 10:15 AM
    A former mental health worker was ordered to stand trial on accusations that she helped a girl elude police after stabbing a 75-year-old woman in the neck near the Bereley Rose Garden.
    Hamaseh Kianfar, 31, of San Rafael was ordered Wednesday to return to court May 18 on a charge of being an accessory after the unprovoked assault that seriously injured Katherine Pope as she and her husband walked home from a film class at University of California, Berkeley.
    and identified the girl.
    The two met while Kianfar worked as a mental health counselor at a juvenile detention facility where the girl was being detained.
    Defense lawyer Laurel Headley said Kianfar is the sole person responsible for the girl's arrest and should not face criminal charges.
    The teen, who was not identified because of her age, has since pleaded guilty to felony assault and is awaiting sentencing.
    Kianfar, who is free on $15,000 bail, faces three years in prison if convicted of the charge.


Bottom line is that these were Middle Class Muslims either directly or indirectly involved in harming Americans. It has nothing to do with Global Connectivity to the extent that Dr. TPMB goes on about ad naseaum. Global Economy and Connectivity are important but bringing Military strength to bear is what will save us. TPMB's panacea is not enough to solve the Problems we face and the people he votes for will blow him off faster than I have. Barnett needs to get behind someone who has more cajones than President Bush's substantial one and Dems have marbles sized ones maybe.....except when it come to conservatives as witnessed by the fact that they'd be happy if Vice President Cheney had gotten killed today jus see the Huffington Post....I do not care for the Politics of liberals like Kennedy and those of his ilk but I do not want them to get killed. I would see an attack on a Democrat President as an attack on my Country...

I solved the Sasquatch Mystery? Al GORE and his Carbon BIG- footprint?

Bigfoot, Big Mouth, Rotund Belly and BIG CARBON FOOTPRINT=Sasquatch! The Mystery of Sasqatch is solved for Michael Medved! Al Gore's Big Carbon Foot Print is he the real Sasquatch? Check out is Al Gore's Inconvenient Utility Bill
Dominus vobiscum,
FXY
+
+
=


Responding to critics, Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper live as "carbon neutral," meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and car trips, by "purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere."

  • Posted by Noel Sheppard on February 20, 2007 - 18:42 @ NewsBusters
  • Sean Hannity Exposes Al Gore’s Inconvenient Global Warming Hypocrisy
    Many conservatives are familiar with a marvelous
    book by Peter Schweizer entitled “Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.” In it, Schweizer detailed how America’s top liberals are famous for not practicing what they preach.
    On Sunday’s “Hannity’s America,” the host demonstrated how the country’s leading global warming alarmist, Dr. Al Gore, is a perfect example of a liberal who doesn’t come close to following the lofty environmental ideals he demands of the rest of us (
    video available here).
    At issue was the inherent absurdity of a self-righteous politician complaining about the dangers of greenhouse gases while he flies fly around the world in private airplanes:
    In short, flying in a private jet does more than four times the carbon emission damage to the environment than flying a regular commercial jet. So if you were worried about your quote-unquote "carbon footprint" on the environment, and if you are concerned about carbon neutrality, the last thing that you should be doing is flying on private jets. Sit in coach, you might save a polar bear.

    In short, flying in a private jet does more than four times the carbon emission damage to the environment than flying a regular commercial jet. So if you were worried about your quote-unquote "carbon footprint" on the environment, and if you are concerned about carbon neutrality, the last thing that you should be doing is flying on private jets. Sit in coach, you might save a polar bear.
    How does Al Gore fit into this equation?
    During the 2000 campaign when Al Gore was running to be president of the United States and along the way giving speeches about the environment, the former vice president traveled on private planes more than a few times. According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, the Gore campaign filed disbursement reports with the Federal Elections Commission, as required law, that document his use of private jets belonging to various businesses and corporations.
    The filings, which are publicly accessible, they reveal that during the period of January of 1999 and January of 2000, Gore reimbursed five groups and corporations for 16 flights on private jets. It is two of these dates that caught our attention.
    On January 27th, 2000, Gore campaign in Concord and Manchester, New Hampshire, and on that very same day reimbursed the Thomas Lee Company $1,400 for the use of their corporate jet. That evening he left New Hampshire and flew back to Washington aboard Air Force Two, the vice president's official plane is a 757, which means that the flight from New Hampshire to Washington, well, the vice president emitted more than 22,000 pounds of CO2.
    Hannity then chronicled more such private trips by Gore, and wonderfully concluded:
    Well, that's carbon neutrality for you. And despite all of that, Gore didn't do anything illegal. And by the way, he wasn't the only candidate who used corporate jets during that election cycle. George Bush, John McCain, Bill Bradley, they all used private jets.
    But the difference is, is that none of the other candidates were running as the great savior of the world's atmosphere. Now he should have known better. He had been writing about the threat of carbon emissions since he published his diatribe in 1992 "Earth in the Balance," by the way, eight years before he was bouncing around on private jets, he wrote the following, quote: "It hardly seems reasonable or even ethical to assume that it is probably all right to keep driving up CO2 levels."
    Now the former vice president is the world's self proclaimed environmental champion. He could very well end up winning an Oscar, and the buzz from his movie has even reignited rumblings of yet another presidential run.
    But in reality, Gore is not unlike the rest of the Gulfstream liberals, while preaching carbon neutrality his own impact on their Earth's environment isn't a footprint, well, it's more like a crater. The double standard is so thick you can cut it like the ozone layer. You see, for Al Gore, sometimes the truth can be inconvenient.
    What follows is a full transcript of this segment.
    HANNITY: And it brings us to our special report this evening, a "Hannity's America" investigation. The man most responsible for the tone of the current global warming debate, well, that's former Vice President Al Gore. His film, "An Inconvenient Truth," has been nominated for an Oscar and Gore has positioned himself as the man who brought the idea of climate change out of the wilderness and into your living room.
    But as you will see in our special report tonight, when it comes to practicing what you preach, Al Gore, he is full of hot air.
    (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
    HANNITY (voice-over): This is Al Gore as he portrays himself in his Oscar-nominated film "An Inconvenient Truth." The former vice president traveled around the world lecturing about the dangers of climate change and the catastrophic that threat global warming poses to the world. Gore has preached the virtues of being carbon-neutral, a phrase that has become so much a part of the public vernacular in the last year that the new Oxford American Dictionary selected it as the word of the year for 2006.
    The idea is that individuals can deter the effects of global warming by calculating their own personal carbon emissions and doing what they can to reduce them and then offsetting the balance by planting a tree or investing in clean energy technologies. Now if you need help in figuring how much damage you are doing to the Earth, well, the Web site for Al Gore's film features a carbon calculator that will not only tell you how poisonous you are to our planet, but exactly what steps you can take to neutralize your effect.
    The vanquished vice president has led the charge towards carbon neutrality and has brought some of his Hollywood friends along with him. But there's more to the story. Something that Al Gore doesn't advertise. When it comes to carbon emissions, Al Gore and his liberal friends, well, they have a dirty little secret.
    Private planes, take for instance your typical commercial jet, a Boeing 737, well, it seats a maximum of 189 people, it burns 800 gallons of fuel per hour and emits 16,880 pounds of carbon dioxide per hour in the air. Now take a Gulfstream 400, one of the more common brands of private jet. Well, it seats a maximum of only 19 people, it burns 415 gallons of fuel an hour and emits 8,785 pounds of carbon dioxide per hour. That means per passenger a Boeing 737 emits 89 pounds of carbon dioxide an hour while Gulfstream and similar private jets emit 462 pounds of carbon dioxide per passenger per hour.
    In short, flying in a private jet does more than four times the carbon emission damage to the environment than flying a regular commercial jet. So if you were worried about your quote-unquote "carbon footprint" on the environment, and if you are concerned about carbon neutrality, the last thing that you should be doing is flying on private jets. Sit in coach, you might save a polar bear.
    But that doesn't seem to stop the environmental elites. The Reuters news agency reports that Europe's largest private jet operator recently came under fire from environmentalists about the 50 flights that he booked for clients to Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Yes, that's the same forum where the, quote, "global climate change" was on the top of the agenda.
    This sort of hypocrisy among environmental elites is not uncommon. The same crowd that once landed the nickname "limousine liberals," well, should be considered "Gulfstream liberals." They are those who lecture us about the dangers posed by climate change and then fly awfully close to the sun in their beautiful luxurious private jets.
    During a 2003 interview on "Hannity & Colmes," for example, I confronted activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about this double standard.
    (on camera): Do you use a private jet?
    ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., ACTIVIST: You know what? I am not going to dignify that question because it is not...
    HANNITY: Because you do. And that's the point. You are going to lecture us about a car and you are traveling around the world in a private jet. And I find that hypocritical. Hypocrisy is an issue.
    KENNEDY: Well, first of all, I don't travel around the world in a private jet. Have I ever been in a private jet? Yes, I have been in a private jet.
    HANNITY: When was the last time?
    KENNEDY: I can't tell you, I can't remember when I -- the last time I was.
    HANNITY (voice-over): It wasn't until a later commercial break that I learned that Kennedy was leaving our New York studio that night to board, you guessed it, a private plane.
    (on camera): By the way, where are you going after the show?
    (LAUGHTER)
    HANNITY: All right. I will let you off the hook. I don't mind if we have greater fuel efficiency. I don't mind alternative sources of energy...
    KENNEDY: I told Sean on the ad that I am taking a private plane to (INAUDIBLE) -- to Florida.
    HANNITY: I didn't -- I let you off the hook. That was your business to tell that, which is a little ironic.
    (voice-over): So where does Al Gore fit into all of this? Certainly the man who has led the noble fight to save our very planet from its own destruction would never personally act in a way that would damage the very thing he is fighting, the man who evoked the iced tea defense could never be accused of hypocrisy, could he?
    Well, guess again. During the 2000 campaign when Al Gore was running to be president of the United States and along the way giving speeches about the environment, the former vice president traveled on private planes more than a few times. According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, the Gore campaign filed disbursement reports with the Federal Elections Commission, as required law, that document his use of private jets belonging to various businesses and corporations.
    The filings, which are publicly accessible, they reveal that during the period of January of 1999 and January of 2000, Gore reimbursed five groups and corporations for 16 flights on private jets. It is two of these dates that caught our attention.
    On January 27th, 2000, Gore campaign in Concord and Manchester, New Hampshire, and on that very same day reimbursed the Thomas Lee Company $1,400 for the use of their corporate jet. That evening he left New Hampshire and flew back to Washington aboard Air Force Two, the vice president's official plane is a 757, which means that the flight from New Hampshire to Washington, well, the vice president emitted more than 22,000 pounds of CO2.
    Back in our nation's capital, Gore attended Bill Clinton's final State of the Union Address. And guess what topic the president addressed?
    BILL CLINTON, 42ND PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The greatest environmental challenge of the new century is global warming. The scientists tell us the 1990s were the hottest decade of the entire millennium. If we fail to reduce the emission of greenhouse gasses, deadly heat waves and droughts will become more frequent, coastal areas will flood, and economies will be disrupted. That is going to happen.
    HANNITY: We all know that Gore ran away from Clinton during the campaign in order to distance himself from his embattled former running mate, but what was going through the vice president's mind when he heard his boss pontificate on the importance of fuel efficiency?
    Well, the next morning Al Gore got back on Air Force Two, returned to New Hampshire, emitting another 22,000 pounds of carbon dioxide along the way. And that the same day, January 28th, 2000, the Gore campaign again reimbursed the Thomas Lee company for yet another $844 for the use once again of their private jet.
    So while is president of the United States is warning the country about the perils of global warming, the vice president is flying back and forth to the Granite State, emitting more than 50,000 pounds of carbon dioxide and reimbursing corporations for the use of their dirty private jets.
    Well, that's carbon neutrality for you. And despite all of that, Gore didn't do anything illegal. And by the way, he wasn't the only candidate who used corporate jets during that election cycle. George Bush, John McCain, Bill Bradley, they all used private jets.
    But the difference is, is that none of the other candidates were running as the great savior of the world's atmosphere. Now he should have known better. He had been writing about the threat of carbon emissions since he published his diatribe in 1992 "Earth in the Balance," by the way, eight years before he was bouncing around on private jets, he wrote the following, quote: "It hardly seems reasonable or even ethical to assume that it is probably all right to keep driving up CO2 levels."
    Now the former vice president is the world's self proclaimed environmental champion. He could very well end up winning an Oscar, and the buzz from his movie has even reignited rumblings of yet another presidential run.
    But in reality, Gore is not unlike the rest of the Gulfstream liberals, while preaching carbon neutrality his own impact on their Earth's environment isn't a footprint, well, it's more like a crater. The double standard is so thick you can cut it like the ozone layer. You see, for Al Gore, sometimes the truth can be inconvenient.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Can a Mormon be President or a Catholic be in the White House again?

A Mormon in the White House?: 10 Things Every American Should Know about Mitt Romney
Presidential Historian, Doris Kearns Godwin discusses the Romney Mormon Issue on Russerted's "Street their Mess"  with the Dean Wormer of Sunday Morning Political & Democratic Max Headrooms and the most pernicious Democratic Apparatchik Tim R, who points out that every description of him begins by stating he is a Mormon.  She discusses JFK's West Virginia I'm am a Catholic and an American who should not be denied the Presidency because of my Religion and to Greater Houston Ministerial Association the Vatican will not run the Oval Office assertion.
 
When I found out Hugh Hewitt was working on a Romney book, I knew that he had Crow Nested this issue long before anyone else when he decided to write it.  Hewitt's latest book's timing on Romney could not be better as it just hits the shelves!  Way to go Eagle Eye Hugh!   This should help his sales and too bad Dean Wormer Russert did not plug it for him. 
 
Mr. Hewitt, please call Dean Wormer Russert and see if you can get on his "Street their Mess" show of spin to help jump start Romney's campaign.  I like Romney a lot but somehow Rudy Giuliani instills more Prize Fighter confidence in me because of the way he handled 911,the exceptional leadership he displayed in addition to the body blows he delivered to the Mafia, a people of his Italian ancestry, during his years as a Federal Prosecutor and an Associate Attorney General during the Reagan Administration:,
  • Giuliani was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It was in this position that he first gained national prominence by prosecuting numerous high-profile cases, resulting in the convictions of Wall Street figures Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken for insider trading. He also spearheaded the effort to jail drug dealers, combat organized crime,  break the web of corruption in government, and prosecute white-collar criminals. He amassed a record of 4,152 convictions with only 25 reversals. Critics disparaged Giuliani, claiming he arranged public arrests of people, then dropped charges for lack of evidence rather than going to trial(from wikipedia)
  • It was in 1983 that Giuliani indicted financiers Marc Rich and Pincus Green on charges of tax evasion and making illegal oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis, in one of the first cases in which the RICO Act was employed in a non-organized crime case.  Rich and Green fled the United States to avoid prosecution; both were eventually pardoned by President Bill Clinton in 2001.
 
 
Giuliani has 'Shoot in his Eyes' and is very impressive indeed in spite of his liberal social stance.  For me, the World War on Jihad(WWJ) preempts the Social Issues because Rudy has stated he will appoint Constructionist Judges in the mold of Scalia, Roberts and Alito, all good Catholics who can shape the Judicial Landscape of America.  To boot Rudy is silver tongued and so very charming and in a self deprecating manner.  RUDY will dismantle monochrome Mrs. Bill Clinton if any Presidential debates between them take place. Imagine the exchange when an authentic "Journalist" poses the Marc Rich question in a debate between these two candidates......hmmm ummm  Goooood!!....%&*#@~`
 
I like both Romney and Giuliani as candidates to take over the GOP but get Hugh Hewitt's new book, "A Mormon in the White House?" here and learn that what JFK expressed in 1960 is still true today for a Mormon and a Catholic.
 
I like Romney's chances and as a Roman Catholic Voter I remember then Senator's JFK's words in his 1960's speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association:
Text of Kennedy's Speech
 
Reverend Meza, Reverend Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation to speak my views.....

While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election; the spread of Communist influence until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida--the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice-President by those who no longer respect our power--the hungry children I saw in West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills, the families forced to give up their farms--an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space.
 
These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issues --for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers.

But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured--perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again--not what kind of church I believe in--for that should be important only to me--but what kind of America I believe in.

I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant ministers would tell their parishioners for whom to vote--where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference--and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant, nor Jewish--where no public official either requests or accepts instruction on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source--where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly on the general populace or the public acts of its officials--where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.

For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew--or a Quaker--or a Unitarian--or a Baptist. It was Virginia's harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson's Statute of Religious Freedom. Today, I may be the victim--but tomorrow it may be you- -until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great National peril.

Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end--where all men and all churches are treated as equal--where every man has the right to attend or not attend the church of his choice--where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind--where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.

This is the kind of America in which I believe. And it represents the kind of Presidency in which I believe--a great office which must neither be humbled by making it the instrument of any one religious group nor tarnished by arbitrarily withholding its occupancy from the members of any one religious group. I believe in a President whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation nor imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office.

I would not look with favor upon a President working to subvert the first amendment's guarantees of religious liberty. Nor would our system of checks and balances permit him to do so- -and neither do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the Constitution by requiring a religious test--even by indirection--for it. If they disagree with that safeguard they should be out openly working to repeal it.

I want a Chief Executive whose public acts are responsible to all groups and obligated to none--who can attend any ceremony, service or dinner his office may appropriately require of him- -and who's fulfillment of his Presidential oath is not limited or conditioned by any religious oath, ritual or obligation.

This is the kind of America I believe in--and this is the kind I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died for in Europe. No one suggested then that we may have a "divided loyalty", that we "did not believe in liberty", or that we belonged to a disloyal group that threatened "freedom for which our forefathers died."

And in fact, this is the kind of America for which our forefathers died--when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied office to members of less favored churches--when they fought for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom-- and when the fought at the shrine I visited today, the Alamo. For side by side with Bowie and Crockett died McCafferty and Bailey and Carey--but no one knows whether they were Catholic or not. For there was no religious test at the Alamo.

I ask you tonight to follow in that tradition--to judge on the basis of my record of 14 years in Congress--on my declared stands against an Ambassador to the Vatican, against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools, and against any boycott of the public schools (which I have attended myself)--instead of judging me on the basis of these pamphlets and publications we have all seen that carefully select quotations out of context from the statements of Catholic church leaders, usually in other countries, frequently in other centuries, and always omitting, of course, the statement of American Bishops in 1948 which strongly endorsed our church-state separation, and which more nearly reflects the views of almost every American Catholic.

I do not consider these other quotations binding upon my public acts--why should you? But let me say, with respect to other countries, that I am wholly opposed to the state being used by any religious group, Catholic or Protestant, to compel, prohibit, or persecute the free exercise of any other religion. And I hope that you and I condemn with equal fervor those nations which deny their Presidency to Protestants and those which deny it to Catholics. And rather than cite the misdeeds of those who differ, I would cite the record of the Catholic church in such nations as Ireland and France--and the independence of such statesmen as Adenauer and De Gaulle.

But let me stress again that these are my views--for contrary to common Newspaper usage--I am not the Catholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for President who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters--and the church does not speak for me.

Whatever issue may come before me as President--on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject--I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise.

But if the time should ever come--and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible--when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same.

But I do not intend to apologize for the views to my critic of either Catholic or Protestant faith--nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election.

If I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the Senate, satisfied that I had tried my best and was fairly judged. But if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized, then it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, and in the eyes of our own people.

But if, on the other hand, I should win the election, then I shall devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the Presidency--practically identical, I might add, to the oath I have taken for 14 years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can "solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution...So Help Me God."


See Article VI Blog for more on can a "Can a Mormon be President?" For me Mormon Matinee Magnate and MBA Mitt is rising Star and Mr. President is another good name too as it would be for 'Shoot in his Eyes' Rudy Giuliani as well, a Catholic to whom JFK's words also apply. 

Friday, February 16, 2007

Sulejman Talovic Arithmetic but the Salt Lake PD does Calculus

Trolley Square Madman Sulejman Talovic(Slavic Version of Suleyman the Magnificent conqueror of the Balkens) is reported by his Aunt to be a practicing Muslim attending Friday Prayers
 
"  Ajka Omerovic said she never knew her nephew to shoot firearms. 
Although he quit school at 16, Sulejman Talovic often attended Friday prayers at the Al-Noor mosque on 700 East in Salt Lake City, said Salih Omerovic, Ajka's cousin. Salih Omerovic said the young man stopped coming to the prayers in December, when he landed a full-time job at Aramark Uniform Services in South Salt Lake. He said Sulejman Talovic's father had pressured his son to get a job to help out with the family's living expenses.
("
http://www.sltrib.com/weather/ci_5230906)
 
He carried an assault type short shotgun see pictured here:
 
Talovic had worked at Aramark Uniform Services for eight weeks on the production line. Monday he worked a full eight-hour shift.
Ajka Omerovic, Aunt: "He was working all day, he came home, took a shower and disappeared."
 
(Wherever the water touches during wudu'[ritual washing], that place will not burn in the hellfire.)
 
Suljeman  sported Wahhabi-style beard see pic here
 
Deseret Morning News goes after Michael Savage, Robert Spencer, and Charles Johnson of Little Greenfootballs and emailers for being bias in an article entitled:
" On ultraconservative Web sites like littlegreenfootballs.com, the story of
 
Monday's shooting rampage at Trolley Square has been reduced to one
 
fact: "Salt Lake City Killer Was a Muslim."
 
O.K Deseret Morning News Let do the addition:
1.  The killer is a Muslim
2.  He attended Friday Prayers at a Mosque
3.  He sported a nascent Whabbi Type Beard madated by radicals
4.  He had high powered assault type guns
5.  He took a shower before going to the Mall with the intention of killing Americans/Ritual Washing known as Wudu
6.  5-6 Lone Assassin Attacks by Muslims in the Last Year in America
7.  Osama in 1998 Fatwa call for "Muslims to kill Americas Everywhere:
8.  Texas Al Qaeda Maldonado in US custody at present
 
Now this is all circumstantial but shouldn't our Journalists and their Outlets consider the possibility that this was a Terrorist Attack? 
 
If Suljeman were of any religion but Muslim the MSM would speculate that fanaticism might be a factor but because of Liberalism Muslims get a Break?  
The Media Emperor(MSM) has No Cloths.   
 
Despite the FBI's and Mainstream Media's Investigative Nonsense someone at the SLC Police Department and Counterterrorism guys have a BRAIN and not ony do addition but may be able to do Calculus Proofs! See Worldnet Daily report:
 
"But Salt Lake Police spokeswoman Robin Snyder told WND the FBI is still working with her department on the case, and investigators continue to explore the terrorism angle. "We will pursue every single lead," she said. "There is not one lead we are not willing to pursue. At this point, we don't have any idea of any motive. Nothing is ruled out."
and
Bruce Tefft, a former CIA counter-terrorism official who advises the New York City Police Department, told WND he was "flabbergasted" by the FBI's statement that it saw no possible connection to terrorism.
Nevertheless, Tefft – a founding member of the CIA's counter-terrorism center in 1985 – said the FBI's quick downplaying of terror ties in such cases is all too familiar and believes spokesman Kiernan probably was embarrassed by his statement.
"It's almost a joke in any counter-terrorism circles that within half a day of most unexplained incidents the FBI comes out and says it isn't terrorism," he said.
 
"They'll come out with a conclusion based on no information."
Kiernan did not reply to WND's request for comment.
 
Harvey Kushner, a counter-terrorism adviser to the federal government, told WND he also sees the FBI's response as typical.
Tefft pointed out, however, the FBI's continued presence in the investigation is an indication the terrorism angle is still being pursued. President Reagan, beginning in 1985, made the FBI the lead agency in all terrorism-related cases, he explained.
Some analysts have posed the possibility that since the objective of terrorism, after all, is to terrorize the public, the U.S. government has attempted to diffuse or take away its effect by publicly dismissing it as a source of violent acts.
Tefft says there is some logic to that, but believes if it were true, it "would show more intelligence in the psychological warfare arena than we've shown to date."
When the FBI uses extreme groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations as sensitivity trainers, "that's ignorance and political correctness, that's not a deliberate psychological warfare tactic," he said.
"I suspect they are just being politically correct to avoid a backlash by Muslims," said Tefft.
 
Finally someone other than Bloggers and Talk Show people are going to follow the obvious lead.  It may be a dead end and Sulejman Talovic make just be a Columbine Maniac but rule out Terrorism first!


We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.

Sulejman Talovic Mainstream Media Diagnosis is Challenged....

Defense:
"Nobody knows," Omerovic said. "We don't know who [gave] him the guns." from the SLC Tribune

Rebuttal:
Lori Dyer, resident agent in charge of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Utah, said the bureau has no information indicating Talovic obtained the guns or ammunition illegally. But the ATF still needs to do more research on the guns' histories.
guns.jpg
Some one got this boy the .38 caliber handgun which is illegal for an 18 year old to buy. The Shotgun can be legally bought by an 18 year old for Hunting(that sure doesn't look like a quail or duck hunting shotgun I've ever used). It looks more like a Mad Max styled assault shortened barrel shotgun with a retractable stock.
  • From Ksl.com: So could have he have done it legally? From what we understand, to buy a handgun in Utah the buyer must be 21 years old. However, if a parent buys a gun for their son or daughter, who is under the age of 21, then it is considered legal. As far as rifles are concerned, to accommodate hunters, a buyer only needs to be 18.


Defense:
Talovic's relatives have referred to him as "a very nice person" who had never hurt anyone.
Omerovic said Talovic had no history of violence. "He never, never [hurt anyone]. He was very nice person."

"Everything about him was nice. Everybody said so," said his father, Suljo
SLC Tribune

Rebuttal:
  1. Not Sulejman Talovic's first act of violence.
  2. At age 12, Talovic in court for allegedly holding a knife over the head of a girl while stating, "I'll kill you," according to a source who is familiar with the case.
  3. Two years earlier, Talovic had been referred to court for throwing rocks at a little girl. The first girl was not struck by the stones. And the mother of the second girl snatched her up just as Talovic took a swipe with the blade, according to the source, who has seen court documents relating to the case.
  4. The rock-throwing incident occurred on Sept. 23, 1999. During a juvenile court trial, the allegations were found to be true, although Talovic denied them
  5. About the same time, he threatened his family's landlord with a knife.

Defense:
  1. FBI spokesman Patrick Kiernan said investigators are aware of Talovic's juvenile criminal history and are considering what role it might have played in the Trolley Square shootings.
  2. The few people who knew Talovic well said his later years were peaceful and more promising, though he struggled to find his place in society.
    SLC Tribune
Serbianna.com a news and media portal about Serbia and Balkans surveying the western press and providing it to the public claims that the father, Suljo Talovic, was a member of the was in the Bosnia Army and had to leave the family along with other Muslim men in Sebrenica, were they lived after their home town of Talovici(family name?) fell into Serb hands. Suljo and other men had to escape the Serbs who attacked and massacred many Bosniaks. Apparently Sebrenica was used as a base of operations from which the Muslims committed atrocities and ethic cleaning on surrounding Serb villages.
During that period, he spent some time in Srebrenica. Before being captured bySerb forces, Srebrenica was used by Bosnian Muslims to massacre all the Serbs in all of the nearby villages only and was later these same Muslims were captured when the town fell.(spelling and wording corrected)
"Suljo, the father, headed over the mountains and forests with his comrades as well. Many left the village, but only a few made it."

The teen gunman left Srebrenica two years before the massacre, but acquaintances suggested it may have left an indelible mark on the quiet little boy they knew.
A 1995 peace agreement ended the war but left their native Talovici in the Serb-controlled half of the country to which the family did not dare return.
"We know they ended up in the United States. We never saw them again. It was a wonderful family," said Zijad Cerkic, 33, the family's next-door neighbor in government-controlled Tuzla.
Apart from eight elderly returnees, Talovici village has been a virtual ghost town since 1993. All but two houses are in ruins, including the home of Sulejman's family, said former neighbor Adem Huric, 38.
Many mujahedeen from Muslim states came in Bosnia to fight in 1992-95 war and committed monstrous atrocities against Serb civilians.

Byzatine Orthodoxy Sacred Art comments on Suljman's Father:
  • It turns out the killer's father was a member of the mujahedeen army during the Bosnian war, and the guy who walked in the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City twelve years later in a trench coat, armed up to his teeth, and calmly gunned down nine Americans at random, including a fifteen year old girl, is one of thousands of Muslim children Serbian army has sent to safety from Srebrenica in 1995, along with their mothers and other family members (murderer's father, mujahedeen fighter, escaped together with the number of other Srebrenica jihadists
I think it is worth reading about another perspective of the Bosnia War from a Serbian immigrant and blogger named Svetlana who blogs at Byzatine Orthodoxy Sacred Art. She has an non MSM perspective that young Sulejman, the Murderer was a misplaced and psychologically traumatized guy who was treated poorly by other kids in school yada yada yada dribble... Why is that only Muslim immigrants seem to "lose it"? I do not see other war torn immigrants like Vietnamese, Serbian or Croatian going postal on us Americans....Hmmmmm?
The perspective of a Serbian immigrant on the Sulejman Trolley Square Rampage is worth reading. Let us be PC Liberals and Conservative and consider all sides and perspectives!...
Bosnian Muslim Utah killer, Sulejman Talovic
Bosnian Muslim mass murderer Sulejman Talovic, named after another mass murderer, the Muslim conqueror of the Balkans,
Suleiman the Magnificent.

Bosnian Muslim

Utah Massacre:

Serbs did That Too!




8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.

Soljeman Talovic's Nacent Wahhabi Beard and Madrid Bombing is there an Al Qaeda connection?

Madrid Train Bombings Trial Begins

2004 Explosions Killed 191 People

AlQaeda Madrid Bombing criminal trials are in their second day of deliberation and tensions are high.  I'm sure Al Qaeda's Top Killer Canine Bin Laded and his chief Lieutenant Ayman al-Zawahri are frothing at the mouth over this so tensions must be high.
AP Image
Composite image of suspects in Madrid train bombings: Top l-r; Emilio Suarez Trashorras, Jamal Zougam, Rabei Osman. Bottom (l-r); Hasan al Haski, Youssef Belhadj and Abdelmajid Bouchar.
3/6 Al Qaeda Terrorist with Wahhabi-style beard one a nascent one ala Sulejman Talovic
Utah gunman portrayed as good Muslim by family
Sulejman Talovic. Noticeable is his nascent Wahhabi-style beard.

 
The Utah Bosniak(A member of a people descended from Slavs from Bosnia who converted to Islam during the period of Ottoman rule)KILLER'S Nacent Wahhabi beard reminds me of the ones sported in some of the alleged killers in Spain's metro rail slaughter. 
 
The war in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina of the 1990's was a blood bath on all sides.  The Western World took the side of the Muslims aka Bosniaks so why are they rewarding us with terrorism in Spain and possibly in Utah where they were welcomed with open arms? 
 
Well here is an interesting little tidbit that may come out in the Madrid trials underway at present and a little known piece of information regarding Muslim Bosniaks an their al Qaeda connection:
  • Reactivation of Bosnian Support Net for New US Attacks?
  • In this context, in the US and Spanish operations, the Bosnian Islamist terror support network plays a key rôle, and GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs has continued to gain information which highlights this fact.
  • Most significant in the European capability for the range of Islamist terrorist activities is the network built up, mostly since 1990-91, in Bosnia & Herzegovina. This network has become the hub of operations extending into Germany, France, Spain, Britain and elsewhere in Western Europe and North America.
    The Bosnian-based operations — which engage a number of different Iranian-run terrorism/insurgency cadres as well as a variety of Arab mujahedin groups as well as direct Bosnian Islamist operations — provided the essential capability for the September 11, 2001, terrorists. That Bosnian network extended to the use of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Mission to the United Nations, in New York.
The Occidental World including Nato(Spain is a Member) and the United States per President Clinton saved the Bosnian Muslims from the Croats and Serbs and this is the way they these Muslims reward us?..  Read this interesting report for your selves:
  • Analysis. By Gregory R. Copley, Editor, GIS. A series of tightly coordinated bombings on the commuter rail networks of Madrid, Spain, during rush hour on the morning of March 11, 2004, were clearly linked to the al-Qaida-related group, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, which during 2003 and 2004 were engaged in geographically dispersed terrorist bombings in Ankara, Turkey, and against the UN compound in Baghdad, Iraq, in August 2003. More than anything, however, the March 11, 2004, bombings highlighted the extensive European network of the various Islamist groups and gave some indications of further activities.
  • There is now evidence to indicate a pattern of terrorist attacks during 2004 designed to help remove the governments of Spain, the US and Australia. In this context, in the US and Spanish operations, the Bosnian Islamist terror support network plays a key rôle, and GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs has continued to gain information which highlights this fact. [GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs readers are familiar with the extensive volume of intelligence material on this matter produced over the past decade; much of that is available in the Special Reports and Archival sections of the Global Information System.]
  • Operations of the magnitude of the March 11, 2004, "Operation Death Trains" (as it was described in the al-Masri communiqué which followed the bombings) require massive support infrastructures. The earlier and most recent al-Masri actions demonstrated a seamless and comprehensive capability which spans Western Europe, and involves networks which have embedded themselves into Western society over the past 15 or more years. In the case of the Iranian aspects of the support network — which not only has supported nominally Shi'i terrorists, but also nominally Sunni (Wahabbi) terrorists — the process of embedding support structures in Western Europe and North America has been underway since 1979, when extremist clerics seized power when the Shah left Iran.
  • In the case of the latest Spanish attacks, Iran had long coordinated terrorist activities, training and other support measures which linked Spain's ETA Basque separatist terrorist organization with other groups. ETA, which was apparently not represented at the gathering of terrorist organizations in Tehran earlier in 2004, has in the past attended Iranian terrorist conclaves, convened, ostensibly, to discuss the Palestinian issue. In reality, the more-or-less annual gatherings in Tehran — addressed and most significantly supported by the so-called "moderate" Iranian Pres. Hojjat ol-Eslam (Ali) Mohammad, Khatami-Ardakani — are gatherings to facilitate cooperation, training, interoperability and financing of disparate terrorist groups aimed at common enemies, particularly the US.
  • ETA routinely attends these gatherings, and its members meet with other Shi'ite and Sunni (and non-Muslim) terrorists from other areas. As well, ETA has trained and used Iranian-controlled terrorist facilities in Lebanon's Beqa'a Valley. However, it is almost certainly the case that ETA was not officially involved in the March 11, 2004, bombings in Madrid, at least from the evidence known thus far. But it is almost certain that some individuals within ETA provided some of the logistical support or local area knowledge for the attacks.
  • Most significant in the European capability for the range of Islamist terrorist activities is the network built up, mostly since 1990-91, in Bosnia & Herzegovina. This network has become the hub of operations extending into Germany, France, Spain, Britain and elsewhere in Western Europe and North America.
  • The Bosnian-based operations — which engage a number of different Iranian-run terrorism/insurgency cadres as well as a variety of Arab mujahedin groups as well as direct Bosnian Islamist operations — provided the essential capability for the September 11, 2001, terrorists. That Bosnian network extended to the use of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Mission to the United Nations, in New York.
  • A September 17, 2003, report in Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily, and entitled Bosnian Official Links With Terrorism, Including 9/11, Become Increasingly Apparent as Clinton, Clark Attempt to Justify Support of Bosnian Militants, noted:
    • A series of tightly coordinated bombings on the commuter rail networks of Madrid, Spain, during rush hour on the morning of March 11, 2004, were clearly linked to the al-Qaida-related group, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, which during 2003 and 2004 were engaged in geographically dispersed terrorist bombings in Ankara, Turkey, and against the UN compound in Baghdad, Iraq, in August 2003. More than anything, however, the March 11, 2004, bombings highlighted the extensive European network of the various Islamist groups and gave some indications of further activities.
      There is now evidence to indicate a pattern of terrorist attacks during 2004 designed to help remove the governments of Spain, the US and Australia. In this context, in the US and Spanish operations, the Bosnian Islamist terror support network plays a key rôle, and GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs has continued to gain information which highlights this fact. [GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs readers are familiar with the extensive volume of intelligence material on this matter produced over the past decade; much of that is available in the Special Reports and Archival sections of the Global Information System.]
      Operations of the magnitude of the March 11, 2004, "Operation Death Trains" (as it was described in the al-Masri communiqué which followed the bombings) require massive support infrastructures. The earlier and most recent al-Masri actions demonstrated a seamless and comprehensive capability which spans Western Europe, and involves networks which have embedded themselves into Western society over the past 15 or more years. In the case of the Iranian aspects of the support network — which not only has supported nominally Shi'i terrorists, but also nominally Sunni (Wahabbi) terrorists — the process of embedding support structures in Western Europe and North America has been underway since 1979, when extremist clerics seized power when the Shah left Iran.
      In the case of the latest Spanish attacks, Iran had long coordinated terrorist activities, training and other support measures which linked Spain's ETA Basque separatist terrorist organization with other groups. ETA, which was apparently not represented at the gathering of terrorist organizations in Tehran earlier in 2004, has in the past attended Iranian terrorist conclaves, convened, ostensibly, to discuss the Palestinian issue. In reality, the more-or-less annual gatherings in Tehran — addressed and most significantly supported by the so-called "moderate" Iranian Pres. Hojjat ol-Eslam (Ali) Mohammad, Khatami-Ardakani — are gatherings to facilitate cooperation, training, interoperability and financing of disparate terrorist groups aimed at common enemies, particularly the US.
      ETA routinely attends these gatherings, and its members meet with other Shi'ite and Sunni (and non-Muslim) terrorists from other areas. As well, ETA has trained and used Iranian-controlled terrorist facilities in Lebanon's Beqa'a Valley. However, it is almost certainly the case that ETA was not officially involved in the March 11, 2004, bombings in Madrid, at least from the evidence known thus far. But it is almost certain that some individuals within ETA provided some of the logistical support or local area knowledge for the attacks.
      Most significant in the European capability for the range of Islamist terrorist activities is the network built up, mostly since 1990-91, in Bosnia & Herzegovina. This network has become the hub of operations extending into Germany, France, Spain, Britain and elsewhere in Western Europe and North America.
      The Bosnian-based operations — which engage a number of different Iranian-run terrorism/insurgency cadres as well as a variety of Arab mujahedin groups as well as direct Bosnian Islamist operations — provided the essential capability for the September 11, 2001, terrorists. That Bosnian network extended to the use of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Mission to the United Nations, in New York.
      A September 17, 2003, report in Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily, and entitled Bosnian Official Links With Terrorism, Including 9/11, Become Increasingly Apparent as Clinton, Clark Attempt to Justify Support of Bosnian Militants, noted:
      A series of documents, just acquired by GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily, highlight the links between radical Islamists in key positions in the Government of Bosnia-Herzegovina (B-H) and known and suspected Islamists with terrorist links. Significantly, one of the key Bosnian Islamist officials, Huso (he later called himself Hussein) Zivalj, was B-H Ambassador to the United Nations during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York. He arrived just before the attacks and left the post shortly thereafter.
      It is now becoming increasingly clear that the movement of Zivalj to the New York post just before (and his departure just after) the September 11, 2001, attacks was not coincidental.
      That extensive report also said:
      Significantly, Zivalj, who is regarded as the most important radical Islamist in the B-H networks, working closely with al-Qaida and Iranian terrorist officials, has a US Green Card (permanent residency), and his family is believed to be living still in Florida. Zivalj now is believed to be a director of Islamic Bank, in B-H. He spent some time, during the communist era in the former Yugoslavia, in prison with Alija Izetbegovic, who later became the Islamist President of B-H. Significantly, Zivalj used his position in Vienna to issue, in 1995, a B-H passport to Safet Catovic [Passport No. BH-46600], and GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily has the documentation on this. Earlier, he had issued a B-H passport to Osama bin Laden, head of the al-Qaida networks.
      Zivalj had been a Vice-President and member of the governing board of the Third World Relief Agency (TWRA), which had been funded by Osama bin Laden, and with which Sheikh Omar Abd-al-Rahman (the so-called "blind sheikh") was involved. The Egyptian Sheikh Omar was convicted for his rôle in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing in New York. TWRA was founded in Vienna in 1987 and had links with the Izetbegovic Government in Bosnia-Herzegovina as well as with Dr Hassan al-Turabi and his terrorist operations in Sudan.
      This network, which played a key and direct rôle in the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, has been at the center of the so-called "green transversal", the line which runs essentially from Afghanistan through Western Europe to North America, running drugs and arms and supporting Islamist proselytization and terrorism. This network, essentially established and managed with the immense support of the late Bosnia-Herzegovina leader Alija Izetbegovic, remains in existence and is tied directly to both al-Qaida as well as with the Iranian Government, which stations Pasdaran (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps: IRGC) fighters in organized groups and compounds inside Bosnia.
      GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily has provided extensive reporting, with documented details and collateral, on this subject for some years, but particularly during the past year. A number of US and European officials engaged in monitoring the implementation of the 1995 Dayton Accords in Bosnia-Herzegovina, however, have consistently refuted the data, largely because it would imply a failure of their mission and, more significantly, it would imply that the current rundown of peacekeeping forces in Bosnia — to meet needs in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere — should not be undertaken.
      Now, however, the messages emanating from Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades and other al-Qaida and Islamist sources is that "al-Qaida" was now 99 percent ready for another major terrorist attack on the United States. In fact, it is not just the amorphous "al-Qaida" — which is merely a convenient catch-all name for the activities now underway — but a heavy campaign to strike at the US and its allies, including particularly Spain and probably the UK (and perhaps Australia), before the US-led Coalition succeeds in helping Iranians remove the radical clerical leaders and find and destroy Osama bin Laden himself. The attack on Madrid, timed three days before general elections, was clearly not a coincidence, and was meant to warn voters that they must pay the price for their Government's support for the US-led "war on terror".
      A similar campaign was clearly planned for the US in 2004, a year which gives the Iranian clerics the chance to achieve "regime change" in the US. Only the removal of the US Bush Administration would give both the Iranian clerics and the bin Laden hierarchy the breathing space they seek.
      GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily reported in 2003 that the Iranian clerics were known to have committed some $200-million to achieving "regime change" in the US. It is not insignificant that a major flow of funds through Albanian-Americans reached now-failed Democratic candidate Gen. Wesley Clark and significant funding is reaching the campaign of Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry through Iranian-Americans, even though the expatriates of both those countries may in large part be unaware why their help had been solicited in funneling funds to the candidates. But the Iranian-bin Laden attempts will go far deeper than that; they will almost certainly include attempts at staging terrorist "spectaculars".
      However, the timing and success of these attacks is critical. Clearly, the attacks must be seen to be overwhelmingly successful, and therefore all planning precautions will be taken to ensure that they do not appear to be "damp squibs" which merely embarrass the perpetrators.
      Significantly, there are indications that the Bosnian support network in the United States remains intact and functioning. Even former BH Ambassador to the UN Huso Zivali remains at large; he has a US permanent resident "Green Card" and his family lives in Florida. One of his key functionaries in the build-up to September 11, 2001, Safet Catevic, and who was clearly involved in the US Islamist operations linked to the September 11, 2001, attacks, also remains at large and may still be in the US.
      But more significantly, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs on March 11, 2001, uncovered extensive intelligence material on the background to the current Bosnia-Herzegovina Permanent Representative (Ambassador) to the United Nations, Kušljugic Mirza, a committed member of the Islamist leadership which had conducted the Bosniak side of the civil war with Iranian and bin Ladenist help in Bosnia, and which later was documented to have supported the September 11, 2001, attacks in the US. A translation from the dossier is quoted at length as follows:
      Kušljugic Mirza, ambassador of BiH [Bosnia & Herzegovina] to UN, during the armed conflict in former Bosnia and Herzegovina, was a member of the highest leadership of Municipal Assembly of the town of Tuzla and the War Presidency of SDP Tuzla, where he planned, encouraged, ordered, committed or in some other way supported planning, preparations and executing the following:
      1. Persecutions of Serbs in the municipality of Tuzla, establishing Muslim authorities based on ethnic and religious background in towns, municipalities and villages where the Serb population lived and worked;
      He participated in a national rebellion in the party SDP BiH in Tuzla when Muslims in 1991 and 1992 informally took over the leadership, keeping all other Serb activists isolated from information and real activities. They created the ruling system based on national and religious background, preparing themselves to illegally attack the Serbs.1
      As a member of the War Presidency SDP in Tuzla and a member of the War Presidency of the Municipal Assembly (MA) in Tuzla, he contributed, by his deeds and actions, to the ethnic cleansing of Serbs in the region of municipality of Tuzla, which consequently led to a downfall of the number of Serbs from 22,000 to 2,000 in 1995.
      Together with the other members of the War Presidency of MA Tuzla, he ordered and supported  illegal mobilization of Serbs although many of them had been incapable for military service and ill, manipulating mobilization in such a way to collect the Serbs on important scientific and professional positions and consequently changing the structure of the authorities.
      During 1992, 1993, and 1994 he supported arresting and dismissing from work the respectable citizens of Serb nationality, and refused to protect them.
      As a member of the highest leadership of the MA Tuzla, he supported torturing and beating of Serbs who had been regularly coming to work (for example, in the company "Solana" and salt mines).
      Together with Ademir Mešetovic, Mevlid Vlaic, Jasmin Imamovic and the others he had been hiding those facts from the foreign politicians and officials of the International Community, humanitarian workers and foreign journalist, as well as hiding the war truth about what was happening in the municipality of Tuzla. In addition, he created a false image on Selim Bešlagic, a president of the War Presidency of MA Tuzla, glorifying his "war charisma" and falsely presenting him in public as a multi-ethnically oriented and democratic politician.
      Together with Rusmir Mahmutcehajic he formed an international forum "Bosnia", which used the motto of democracy, human rights and multi-ethnicity   to cover the position of the absolute domination of Bosniaks in BiH aimed at achieving not - democratic goals in the whole territory of BiH.
      2. War Crimes against Serbs (illegal arrests, imprisonment, liquidations, inhuman and brutal treatments)
      As a member of the highest leadership of the municipality Tuzla he was acquainted with the fact that the secret lists for arrests and liquidations of Serbs had been made, thus he allowed and supported establishment of private jails in Tuzla kept by jailkeepers Faruk Prcic and Ahmet Šerija Zaimovic. All the members of the Presidency knew what was happening in jails, they refused to prevent torturing and abuse of prisoners. On one occasion when Faruk Prcic shot dead a Serb in premises of the Institute where one of the jails was based, he was told not to do it in that place.
      As a member of the War Presidency, Kušljugic knew that the arrests and liquidations of Serbs had been going on but he did not do anything to prevent it nor to take them into his protection. Serbs had been arrested and liquidated in their apartments, houses, streets and factories, and the arrested ones taken to death camps Ljubace and Kladanj. The bodies of the liquidated Serbs had been thrown into pits, and afterwards dug-out and buried in some secret places by special forces of the central party SDA.2
      The purpose of those crimes was to eliminate Serbs from a political and public life.
      3. Hiding traces of the committed war crimes
      As a member of the War Presidency he knew that the bodies of dead soldiers in Trnovo had been dug out next to the Orthodox cemetery. The bodies were removed to different locations three times. Excavations were done by Faruk Prcic and organized by Timun Mumic from the SDA headquarters, while an advisor was Amir Meševic.
      4.  Involvement in preparations, planning and organization of attacks on the civilians and religious sites
      Kušljugic participated in making decisions on the attacks launched at Dubica and Kalesije, refusing to forbid burning and plundering of Serbs' houses and churches.
      In addition, he participated in making decisions on the attacks and cleansing in Caklovici, Simin Han, and Pozarnica where significant numbers of civilians were murdered, houses plundered and burned down; the rest of the population fled, and the Orthodox church was severely devastated (Faruk Prcic, a member of an engineering unit of the Tuzla's brigade, destroyed it), and nothing was done to prevent or forbid such activities.
      Together with Sead Avdic and Selim Bešlagic, Kušljugic made decisions to launch attacks on Tinj and Duboki Potok, where they burned down, destroyed and plundered everything on their way with a purpose to make a military and logistic corridor  toward the North and Croatia. Within the War Presidency, Kusljugiæ was one of the decisionmakers  who launched attacks on Smoluca.3
      5. Participation in weapons supplies to Muslims- Bosniaks and preparations of attacks against Serbs
      Together with Ademir Mešetovic [Kušljugic] participated in illegal weapons supplies from Croatia in 1991 and 1992, making payments by distribution of newly build flats by "Tehnograd" Tuzla.
      As a member of the War Presidency he participated in planning of the attacks launched at a convoy of JNA [Yugoslav National Army] although it had been arranged in advance, on May 15 1992, that the convoy would leave the town of Tuzla in peace;
      6. Participated in illegal production an use of prohibited weapons
      As a member of the War Presidency of MA Tuzla, Kušljugic participated in making decisions on production of chemical weapons based on chlorine. Adem Tucakovic alias Tuke was in charge of production of chlorine weapons in the "HAK". Shells filled with chlorine were made under the supervision of Faruk Prcic in "TTU". The chlorine shells were produced  in premises of "UMEL" behind the UNHCR field office.
      7. Direct cooperation with Islamic fundamentalists
      During the war in Tuzla, Kušljugic established a direct cooperation with the representatives of TWRA in Vienna, known for its undemocratic, Islamist, militaristic and intelligence role in the whole world.
      8. Other
      What gives the best description of Kušljugic's personality is the fact that in his Cabinet based in premises of Electro-technical Faculty in Tuzla, he keeps stolen paintings of an artist Nezir Corbic from Tuzla. The paintings were stolen from the artist's studio in Tuzla in 1992. Allegedly, Kušljugic has bought the paintings from Cazim Sarajlic, a manager of the gallery of fine arts in Tuzla.
      Footnotes to the Dossier
      1. The war structure of SDP party and its leadership was a such one that it included only Muslims or rather Bosniaks, having eliminated all the Serbs, Croats and Bosniak- intellectuals who had refused to abide with the policy of a national selection.
      2. The list had been made by Adnan Jahic, Rifet Haskic (SDA bought him an apartment), Vedad Spahic - Vana, Salih Brkic (at the time advisor and a coordinator), Meho Krainovic (supported those activities, a refugee from Bijeljina). One of the jails was in a basement of the Institute in Miladije, where distinguished citizens from Tuzla, Serbs, had been tortured and beaten. Only two floors above the jail, in the same Institute building, the War Presidency was based led by Selim Bešlagic. Citizens who resided next to the Institute on daily basis used to hear screams and moans of the tortured people, so they would sent their children away from the Institute. Zaimovic has received a pension from the Government of Netherlands, he freely goes visiting his daughter in the Netherlands, remaining free from any sanctions by the Federation BiH for having committed war crimes. 
      3. Immediate carriers and perpetrators of crimes against Serbs were the following persons:
      (i)     ŽILIC MEHMED, Chief of Security in the 2nd Corps HQ Army FBiH, so called ABiH, in charge of the death camps in Lubaca and Kladanj;
      (ii)     ENES BECIC, today employed as an engineer in Tuzla;
      (iii)    JAHIC- brother of SULJO JAHIC, employed in the Headquarters in Tuzla;
      (iv)     AVDO MEŠIC (company "Tuzla - Broker")  had given his minibuses for the purpose of arresting and transporting Serbs into the death camps;
      (v)     TUFIK SELIMBAŠIC, an armed escort of SIFET KREKIC, used to murder some of the arrested Serbs immediately on the spot. Today, an owner of a sawmill in Brateljevici near the town of Kladanj, enjoying protection of some Cauševic from getting arrested;
      (vi)     MEHO BEGIC, at the time in charge of making lists of the Orthodox churches to be destroyed;
      (vii)    JASMIN IMAMOVIC, in charge of the action of destroying the building "Borac".
      The situation is now that both the Iranian and "al-Qaida" leaderships must move with increasing speed and rapidity if they are to remove their major opponents before they themselves can be removed: 2004 is the decisive year for them both. Striking Madrid on March 11, 2004, was intended to help remove the current Spanish Government of Prime Minister José Maria Aznar at the forthcoming elections. If the Spanish electorate responds by overwhelmingly supporting Sr Aznar's Popular Party (Partido Popular, PP), then the Iranian and bin Ladenist leadership could conceivably reconsider how it conducted further attacks against, say, the US in the run-up to the November 2004 Presidential and Congressional elections. But if the Spanish electorate is perceived to react in a manner which reproaches Prime Minister Aznar, then the Iranian and bin Laden team would almost certainly move to implement major terrorist "spectaculars" in the US, attempting to show how the Bush Administration had failed to protect the US from terrorist attacks.
      Having said that, it is now almost inconceivable that — regardless of the outcome of the Spanish elections — the Iranian and bin Ladenist leadership would not go ahead with attacks on the US in an attempt to influence the elections there. Equally, attacks will almost certainly be held to influence the elections which must be held in Australia before November 10, 2004.
      In the interim, the "success" of the March 11, 2004, attacks in Madrid would provide impetus for the attacks which intelligence reporting indicates have been planned for the August 2004 Athens Olympic Games. In attacks on the US and the Olympics, as with the attacks of March 11, 2004, in Madrid, the Bosnian Islamist network plays a crucial rôle. Attacks on the Olympics would risk to a certain degree the operational planning, distribution and safe-have hub which Bosnia has provided for the Islamist push into Europe, just as attacks in Australia would end the safe-haven status of that country for Islamists who have wished to move out of sight.
      However, given the fact that both Osama bin Laden and his team, and the Iranian clerics are fighting for their lives, the short-term objective of survival should be expected to prevail over the risk of such attacks to the long-term viability of the safe-haven bases. Indeed, if Iran and bin Laden were to be successful in removing the Bush Administration in the US, the Aznar Administration in Spain and the Howard Administration in Australia, then it is entirely likely that they would have broken the back of their opposition, and the "war on terror" would be sidelined.
      The push into Western and Central Europe by the Islamists would then move forward, including a renewed outbreak of war in Bosnia-Herzegovina — to drive the Serbs of Republica Srpska out of that remaining territory in Bosnia — and in Serbia, to remove the Serbs from Kosovo and Metohija as well as the Raška area of southern Serbia; and in Montenegro, to ensure the removal of Montenegrin Christians; and in Macedonia, to ensure the geographic security of the Muslim territory which could provide a clean, almost unbroken link from Afghanistan to the heart of Europe.
      In all of this, the Bosnian network is paramount. It has provided weapons and manpower for the conflict against the US-led Coalitions in Iraq and Afghanistan during the past year, and provided the essential infrastructure in Europe which helped the Madrid attacks. Significantly, Bosnia-Herzegovina has in place in its UN Embassy in New York a committed Islamist, already tied to major war crimes. Just as it did in the run-up to the September 11, 2001, attacks. The US did not even investigate the links following September 11; the Bosniak leadership is counting on the fact that the US will not now look into the Bosnian link.


Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.